BENOIST v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS

No. 75-522C(2).

425 F.Supp. 1138 (1976)

BENOIST, E. E., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, and United Transportation Union, Norfolk & Western Railroad Carrier Representatives, Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

December 29, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles P. Todt and Susan Hammer, Clayton, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Albert E. Schoenbeck, St. Louis, Mo., Martin M. Lucente, Chicago, Ill., for Norfolk & Western RR Co.

John H. Haley, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for United Transp. Un.

John L. Rooney, St. Louis, Mo., for Brotherhood of Loc.


MEMORANDUM

REGAN, District Judge.

The basic issue for resolution on defendants' motions to dismiss is whether this action should be dismissed under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction.

Notwithstanding plaintiff's contention to the contrary, the controversy in this case arises and has its roots in the merger of the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Company (Nickel Plate) and the Norfolk & Western Railway Company (N & W) and the consolidation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases