1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.H.
  4. 116 N.H.
  5. 116 N.H. 37 (1976)
 

STATE v. GOODWIN

No. 7203.

116 N.H. 37 (1976)

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. JACK GOODWIN.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

January 31, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren B. Rudman, attorney general, and Peter W. Heed, attorney appearing pursuant to Rule 23 (Mr. Heed orally), for the State.

Junkins & Gillis (Mr. Laurence J. Gillis orally) for the defendant.

LAMPRON, J.

The issue presented here is whether an individual is placed in double jeopardy when he is charged with multiple offenses arising out of the same act and prosecuted for those offenses in a consolidated action.

While operating a motor vehicle near Seabrook, New Hampshire, the defendant, Jack Goodwin, was stopped, arrested, and charged with violations of RSA 262-A:62 (Supp. 1975) (driving while intoxicated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases