FINLAY-WHEELER v. ROFINOT


556 P.2d 952 (1976)

276 Or. 865

Toni FINLAY-WHEELER, and Florence J. Finlay, Appellants, v. Dorothy M. ROFINOT, Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard Andrew Finlay, Deceased, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department No. 1.

Decided December 2, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip F. Schuster II, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs was David C. Bond, Portland.

Harold L. Olsen, St. Helens, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Vagt, Olsen & Coon, St. Helens.

Before DENECKE, C.J., HOLMAN, HOWELL and LENT, JJ., and BOHANNON, J. Pro Tem.


BOHANNON, Justice Pro Tem.

This is an action for damages for breach of a divorce property settlement agreement brought by plaintiffs against the defendant, who is the widow and personal representative of the estate of Richard Andrew Finlay, deceased.

Toni Finlay-Wheeler is the daughter of the deceased. Florence J. Finlay is the divorced former wife of the decedent and the mother of Toni. The property settlement agreement upon which the present action is based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases