VANDERZANDEN v. SEXSON


555 P.2d 946 (1976)

27 Or.App. 139

Edward H. VANDERZANDEN et al., Appellants, v. James E. SEXSON, Director, Water Resources Department of the State of Oregon, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 1, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Moore, Hillsboro, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Brink, Moore, Brink & Peterson, Hillsboro.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FORT and THORNTON, JJ.


FORT, Judge.

This is a mandamus proceeding brought by certain landowners against the State Engineer1 to compel him to hold a hearing upon petitioners' application for change in point of diversion of water based upon water right certificates issued to petitioners or their predecessors in interest allowing each specified quantities of water from West Dairy Creek. ORS 540.520. Respondent made return, issue was joined and the court heard extensive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases