1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 408 F.Supp.
  5. 408 F.Supp. 1075 (1976)
 

AM. TEL. & TEL. CO. v. DELTA COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

Civ. No. 1564(C).

408 F.Supp. 1075 (1976)

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. DELTA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendant and Counterclaimant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, et al., Counter-Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. Mississippi, E. D.

February 25, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George H. Butler, Phineas Stevens, Lawrence J. Franck, Jackson, Miss., O. Winston Cameron, Meridian, Miss., J. G. Kilpatric, New York City, Guerry R. Thornton, Atlanta, Ga., John P. Fons, New York City, for American Tel. & Tel. Co., a New York corporation, plaintiff and counterdefendant.

R. E. Wilbourn, T. K. Holyfield, Meridian, Miss., Rufus Creekmore, Jackson, Miss., John C. Dawson, Robbin R. Dawson, Houston, Tex., Thomas M. P. Christensen, Fairfax, Va., for Delta Communications Corp., a Mississippi corporation, defendant and counterclaimant.

Alex A. Alston, Jr., Jackson, Miss., James H. Kelley, James R. Loftis, III, Washington, D. C., for American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

Sherwood W. Wise, Thomas G. Lilly, Jackson, Miss., Timothy B. Dyk, James Robertson, Ronald J. Greene, Washington, D. C., for CBS, Inc.

E. L. Brunini, William Timothy Jones, Jackson, Miss., David S. Hope, Philadelphia, Pa., for National Broadcasting Co., Inc.

Walter W. Eppes, Jr., Thomas Y. Minniece, Paul M. Neville, Meridian, Miss., for Southern Television Corp.

CLARK, Circuit Judge.*

After sifting every bushel of speculative chaff suggested by the claimant, the court finds not a single grain of antitrust wheat to sustain the claims asserted. The thousands of pages of depositions and affidavits presented and the hundreds upon hundreds of pages of memoranda, motions, replies, and answers do not show any genuine issue of fact as to any claim which will support any antitrust...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases