1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 545 P.2d
  5. 545 P.2d 914 (1976)
 

SKOOKUM CO., INC. v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

545 P.2d 914 (1976)

The SKOOKUM CO., INC., Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 3, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Ruyle, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner. With him on the brief were Sabin, Newcomb, Sabin & Meyer, Portland.

Donald S. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents Wells, Gibson, McDonald, Mandrones, Webber, Burke, Olsen, Haliski, Erceg, Peterson and Clegg. With him on the brief were James W. Kasameyer and Richardson & Murphy, Portland.

No appearance for respondent Employment Division.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON and LEE, JJ.

LEE, Judge.

This is a judicial review of a final order of the Employment Appeals Board allowing benefits. ORS 657.282. The Board affirmed the decision of the referee, ORS 657.270(2), which had allowed benefits for a 40-day period hereinafter described.

The issue was whether claimants were subject to the "labor dispute" disqualification in ORS 657.200(1), which provides:

"An individual is disqualified for benefits for any week with respect to which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases