LYMAN v. HATCH

No. 14164.

546 P.2d 910 (1976)

Karl R. LYMAN and Edith K. Lyman, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Howard F. HATCH and Leland G. Brooks, Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 3, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glen J. Ellis, Maxfield, Gammon, Ellis & Dalebout, Provo, for defendants and appellants.

Dallas H. Young, Jr., Ivie & Young, Provo, for plaintiffs and respondents.


HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a judgment on a promissory note awarded by the trial court, sitting without a jury. Affirmed, with costs on appeal to plaintiffs.

The defendants (appellants here) urge that although they signed the note, subject of this litigation, the obligation attendant thereto was an offspring of a nudum pacum document that did not mean what it clearly said. This, it is averred, is because the history of its conception resulted in still...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases