1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 545 P.2d
  5. 545 P.2d 894 (1976)
 

REFLOW v. REFLOW

545 P.2d 894 (1976)

Jerry Lee REFLOW, Appellant, v. Melva Catherine REFLOW, Respondent, Paul and Judy Seabert, Interveners-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 9, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Herndon, Gladstone, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant Reflow.

Sidney A. Brockley, Oregon City, argued the cause for interveners-appellants Seabert. With him on the brief were Jack, Goodwin & Urbigkeit, Oregon City.

Ronald E. Hergert, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hibbard, Caldwell, Canning, Bowerman & Schultz, Oregon City.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and THORNTON, JJ.

LANGTRY, Judge.

The interveners, Seaberts, and the subject children's father appeal from an order awarding custody of Becky and Butch, now aged 8 and 6, to mother. They have been in the physical custody of the interveners at Aberdeen, Washington for several years pursuant to the marriage-dissolution court's order. Interveners are sister and brother-in-law of father. Both appellants contend that it is in the children's best interests that they remain with interveners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases