I. S. JOSEPH CO., INC. v. MANNESMANN PIPE & STEEL CORP.

No. 4-75-Civ-359.

408 F.Supp. 1023 (1976)

I. S. JOSEPH COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. MANNESMANN PIPE AND STEEL CORPORATION and Mannesmann Aktiengesellschaft, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

March 10, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Quaintance, Jr., and Andris A. Baltins, Maslon, Kaplan, Edelman, Borman, Brand & McNulty, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

Lawrence C. Brown, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, Minn., and James M. Rhodes, Coudert Brothers, New York City, for defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

The primary issue raised by this motion to dismiss is whether extra-territorial service of process on a West German corporation, with no demonstrated contacts with this district, is permissible where plaintiff alleges it has conspired to violate the antitrust laws. Plaintiff contends that defendant Mannesmann Aktiengesellschaft (MAG) was properly served under § 12 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 22 or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases