1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 46 Ohio
  5. 46 Ohio St. 2d 95 (1976)
 

BAILEY v. MARTINS FERRY

No. 75-639.

46 Ohio St. 2d 95 (1976)

BAILEY ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CITY OF MARTINS FERRY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 28, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Andrew Hutyera and Mr. Andrew W. Miller, for appellees.

Mr. Karl W. Sommer, Jr., city solicitor, Messrs. Riley, Ucker & Lavinsky and Mr. Timothy J. Ucker, for appellants.

Per Curiam.

The sole issue presented is whether the ordinance in question is in conflict with R. C. 4511.06 and 4513.31,1 and, therefore, contrary to Section 3 of Article XVIII of the Constitution of Ohio.

Often referred to as the "home rule amendment," Section 3 of Article XVIII provides:

"Municipalities shall have authority to exercise all powers of local self-government and to adopt and enforce within their limits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases