1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 412 F.Supp.
  5. 412 F.Supp. 943 (1976)
 

IN RE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION

Misc. No. 76-26.

412 F.Supp. 943 (1976)

In re GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION, Joseph B. Sturgis, Esq., Witness.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

As Amended May 24, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Penrose, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Ross Van Denbergh, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EDWARD R. BECKER, District Judge.

This matter involves the nature and scope of the attorney work product doctrine as it applies to grand jury witnesses.

In connection with its investigation of certain bank loan transactions, the grand jury issued a subpoena duces tecum to the respondent, an attorney with a law firm which represents the bank. The bank, as client, waived the attorney-client privilege, but the witness asserted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases