WEEMS v. BOILLOT

No. 75-370.

535 S.W.2d 817 (1976)

Howard WEEMS, Appellant, v. Purl Fuss BOILLOT, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Epley & Epley, Ltd. by Alan D. Epley, Eureka Springs, for appellant.

R. Edward Buice and John O. Maberry, of Maberry & Buice, Eureka Springs, for appellee.


GEORGE ROSE SMITH, Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court's refusal to set aside a default judgment in an action upon a promissory note. There were two defendants, Howard Weems and McKinley Weems, co-makers of the note. Howard alone appeals. Although three points for reversal are argued, the principal issue is whether the court erred in simultaneously setting aside the default judgment against McKinley but refusing to set it aside as to Howard.

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases