UNITED STATES v. OBSCENE MAGAZINES, FILM AND CARDS

Nos. 75-1279, 75-1290.

541 F.2d 810 (1976)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OBSCENE MAGAZINES, FILM AND CARDS, Defendant, Michael Mahr, Claimant and Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THIRTY-SEVEN (37) PHOTOGRAPHS, Defendant, Milton Luros, Claimant and Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 9, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Dooley, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff and appellant.

Stanley Fleishman (argued), of Fleishman, McDaniel, Brown & Weston, Beverly Hills, Cal., for claimants and appellees.

Before SMITH, TRASK, and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.


GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

We affirm the denial of forfeiture in these two in rem obscenity forfeiture proceedings which were tried to the court without a jury. The government has appealed, and the appeals have been combined.

While the exhibits differ from each other, all depict human bodies, or parts thereof, in various postures of reproductive or erotic behavior. Some, if not all, of the exhibits probably would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases