HANDEL v. GOLDFARB

No. 75-1497.

531 F.2d 820 (1976)

HOESCH HANDEL AG, formerly known as Hoesch Handel GMBH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles GOLDFARB, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 20, 1976.


ORDER

Upon consideration, it is ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be and it is hereby denied.

McCREE, Circuit Judge (dissenting).

I would grant the motion for rehearing. The loss occasioned by plaintiff caused by its reliance on Goldbarb's misrepresentation is the amount that Hoesch Handel would have recovered from United if the bond had been authorized. Since United is now in insolvency proceedings, the damages recoverable would be limited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases