RODRIGUEZ v. BEAME

No. 76 Civ. 2822(MP).

423 F.Supp. 906 (1976)

Marcelo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. Abraham BEAME et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

December 21, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Bernard Richland, Corp. Counsel, City of New York, New York City, by Diane Iushewitz, New York City, for defendants.

Marcelo Rodriguez, pro se.


OPINION

POLLACK, District Judge.

Defendant, James Farrell, moves pursuant to Rule 56(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the claims herein are precluded under the doctrine of collateral estoppel by a prior decision on the merits adverse to plaintiff.

For the reasons appearing hereafter, the motion is granted.

This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against a New York City Detective, James...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases