IN RE PENN CENT. SECURITIES LITIGATION

No. 56.

416 F.Supp. 907 (1976)

In re PENN CENTRAL SECURITIES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 21, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Berger, P. A., pro se.

Nemser & Nemser, pro se.

Julien & Schlesinger, pro se.

Kass, Goodkind, Wechsler & Gersten, pro se.

Blum, Haimoff, Gersen, Lipson & Szabad, pro se.

Bachner, Talley & Mantell, pro se.

Lipper, Lowey & Dannenberg, pro se.

Ira Jay Sands, pro se.

Ostroff & Lawler, pro se.

Wolf, Popper, Ross, Wolf & Jones, pro se.

Brooks, Tarlton, Gilbert, Douglas & Kressler, pro se.

White, McElroy, White, Sides & Rector, pro se.

Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, pro se.

Modell, Pincus, Hahn & Reich, pro se.

Blank, Rome, Klaus & Comisky, Philadelphia, Pa., for Penn Central Transportation Co.

Farage & Shrager, Philadelphia, Pa., for Penn Central Co.

Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., for Broker Claimants.


OPINION

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.

The bankruptcy of the Penn Central Transportation Company has provided no dearth of business for the courts. As a result, the financial morass into which the various Penn Central companies fell has kept occupied a significant number of lawyers. Those lawyers who have prosecuted the Penn Central Securities Litigation to settlement have now petitioned for the award of counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases