SMITH v. POND

No. 75-352.

534 S.W.2d 769 (1976)

Lowell E. SMITH and Martha S. Smith, Appellants, v. C. H. POND et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elrod, Elrod & Elrod by John R. Elrod, Siloam Springs, for appellants.

Walker, Campbell, McCorkindale & Young, Harrison, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

This decree must be affirmed, owing to the appellants' noncompliance with Supreme Court Rule 9. Instead of submitting an abstract of the record, as the rule requires, the appellants have simply printed the record, including 265 pages of testimony in question and answer form. That is followed by a ten-page brief, arguing only an issue of fact turning upon the preponderance of the evidence. Under our settled practice an affirmance is required. Sellers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases