1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 336 So.2d
  5. 336 So.2d 958 (1976)
 

DIETZEL v. MELDER

No. 5574.

336 So.2d 958 (1976)

Lester DIETZEL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. E. W. MELDER et al., Defendants and Appellees.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

August 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruscato & Loomis by Albert E. Loomis, III, and Percy A. Ford, Jr., Monroe, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Vincent Hazelton, Alexandria, for defendant and appellant.

George & George by Robert D. Hoover, Baton Rouge, for intervenor and appellant.

Teekell & Chaudoir by Lloyd G. Teekell, Stafford, Randow, O'Neal & Scott by Hodge O'Neal, III, Alexandria, for defendants and appellees.

Before HOOD, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of Motors Insurance Corporation et al. v. Melder et al., 336 So.2d 954, in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this date, the judgment of the district court in the present case is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the appellants.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases