1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 557 P.2d
  5. 557 P.2d 701 (1976)
 

STATE v. BURRIS

557 P.2d 701 (1976)

27 Or.App. 835

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William Ralph BURRIS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard S. Mannis, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Catherine Allan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON and RICHARDSON, JJ.

SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a stolen motor vehicle. ORS 481.990(5).

The state urges that we dismiss defendant's appeal for failure to comply with this court's Rules of Procedure. Defendant's brief fails to comply with the following rules:

Rule 6.15, which requires a list of authorities referred to in the brief;

Rule 6.17, which requires that the statement of facts contain references to where in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases