1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 74 Wis.2d
  5. 74 Wis.2d 46 (1976)
 

PADILLA v. BYDALEK

No. 580 (1974).

74 Wis.2d 46 (1976)

245 N.W.2d 915

PADILLA, Appellant, v. BYDALEK, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 5, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Theodore W. Harris of Racine.

For the respondent there was a brief by Foley & Capwell, S. C. and oral argument by John T. Bode, all of Racine.

[1] ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

The only question presented on this appeal from a judgment of nonsuit is whether the evidence presented by plaintiff created a jury question.1 That was the question before the trial court on defendant's motion for nonsuit, and is the question before this court now.2 Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, if there is any inference which might reasonably be drawn...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases