1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 407 F.Supp.
  5. 407 F.Supp. 792 (1976)
 

JACKSON v. WEINBERGER

No. Civ-75-280.

407 F.Supp. 792 (1976)

Dorothy JACKSON and Joyce Carter, Individually, on behalf of their minor children and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, and Maria Bonilla, Individually, on behalf of her minor children, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Caspar WEINBERGER, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W. D. New York.

February 9, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

K. Wade Eaton, Greater Up-State Law Project, Rochester, N. Y., Marilyn Zahm, Neighborhood Legal Services, Buffalo Legal Aid Bureau, Inc., Buffalo, N. Y., James S. Martin, Legal Aid Society of Schenectady, Inc., Schenectady, N. Y., for plaintiffs.

John C. Gray, Jr., Brooklyn, N. Y. (Lloyd Constantine, of counsel), Brooklyn Legal Services Corp., Brooklyn, N. Y., B. K. Wade Eaton, Greater Up-State Law Project, Rochester, N. Y., for plaintiff-intervenor.

Richard J. Arcara, U. S. Atty., Buffalo, N. Y. (Edward J. Wagner, Buffalo, N. Y., Borge Varmer, Regional Atty., Region II, and Annette Blum, Asst. Regional Atty., Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for federal defendant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York (Peter J. Todoro, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for state defendant.

James L. Magavern, Erie County Atty., Buffalo, N. Y. (Robert J. Pierce, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for county defendant Sipprell.

Frank Tedeschi, Schenectady, N. Y., for defendant Staszak.

CURTIN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action to challenge the recoupment provisions of both the federal [45 C.F.R. § 233.20(a)(12)(i)(A)(2)] and New York State [18 N.Y.C.R.R. § 352.31(d)(2)] statutes under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program [AFDC], 42 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. These regulations allow AFDC overpayments, caused by the willful withholding of information by a recipient, to be recouped by deductions from future payments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases