HINDMAN v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, CORRECTIONS DIVISION


547 P.2d 646 (1976)

Charles HINDMAN, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, CORRECTIONS DIVISION, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 5, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John K. Hoover, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and FORT, JJ.


SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

Petitioner appeals from a final order of the Disciplinary Committee of the Oregon State Penitentiary finding him guilty of violations of Major Rules 3 (present in an unauthorized area)1 and 11 (disobedience of an order.2 Petitioner contends that the Disciplinary Committee erred in finding him guilty of being in an unauthorized area.3

There is evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases