UNITED STATES v. CORTESE

No. 76-1474.

540 F.2d 640 (1976)

UNITED STATES of America and Joseph A. Dollard, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, Petitioners-Appellees, v. Americo V. CORTESE, Prothonotary Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, Respondent-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided August 10, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott P. Crampton, Gilbert E. Andrews, Carleton D. Powell, Daniel F. Ross, Washington, D. C., Robert E. J. Curran, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

Jonathan Vipond, III, Michael L. Seabolt, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and ADAMS and HUNTER, Circuit Judges.


JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether contingent fee agreements filed with the Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas under Rule 202 of that court ("Local Rule 202") are privileged as a matter of federal common law from compulsory production to the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") under a summons issued pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7602.1 On the basis of our decision also filed this day, in In re Grand Jury Impaneled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases