1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 355 A.2d
  5. 355 A.2d 805 (1976)
 

O'NEILL v. DISTRICT OF COL. OFFICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS

No. 7408.

355 A.2d 805 (1976)

Hugh O'NEILL and Herbert S. Yarus, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided April 13, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh O'Neill pro se.

Earl A. Gershenow, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., with whom C. Francis Murphy, Corp. Counsel, Washington D. C., at the time the brief was filed, and Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before KELLY, KERN and NEBEKER, Associate Judges.

KERN, Associate Judge:

Petitioners O'Neill and Yarus were two of some 1,400 persons employed by the Department of General Services of the District of Columbia (DGS) at the time this controversy commenced in 1971. They occupied the positions of Engineering Technicians in the work order branch of the Bureau of Repairs and Improvements classified as a GS-12 and a GS-11, respectively. Neither of their positions, however, is in the competitive service.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases