1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 355 A.2d
  5. 355 A.2d 789 (1976)
 

THOMAS v. DISTRICT OF COL. BD. OF APPEALS AND REV.

No. 8970.

355 A.2d 789 (1976)

Harold THOMAS et al., Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF APPEALS AND REVIEW, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided April 13, 1976.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 29, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Hodges, with whom Edward E. Schwab, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioners.

Leo N. Gorman, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., with whom C. Francis Murphy, Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., at the time the brief was filed, Louis P. Robbins, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before KELLY, GALLAGHER and NEBEKER, Associate Judges.

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

Petitioners are uninsured motorists whose drivers' licenses were suspended after they failed to comply with provisions of the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act (D.C.Code 1973, § 40-417, et seq.) by not posting security to cover possible liability from traffic accidents. The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) refused to hold hearings. Therefore, after suspension, petitioners sought review before respondent Board of Appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases