1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 552 P.2d
  5. 552 P.2d 588 (1976)
 

JUDSON v. LINCOLN CITY

552 P.2d 588 (1976)

Burch R. JUDSON et al., Appellants, v. LINCOLN CITY, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Reargued and Submitted March 23, 1976.

Decided August 9, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott McArthur, Monmouth, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were McArthur & Horner, P.C., Monmouth.

James Kulla, Lincoln City, argued the cause for respondent City of Lincoln City and its officers. On the brief was Michael G. Dowsett, City Atty., Lincoln City.

Dan W. Poling, Lincoln City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Journeymen, Inc., an Oregon corporation.

No appearance for respondent Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen. of the State of Oregon.

FORT, Judge.

Affirmed. Brooks v. Dierker, 275 Or. ___, 552 P.2d 533 (decided July 29, 1976).

THORNTON, Judge (specially concurring).

I concur for the reasons stated in my specially concurring opinion in Caldwell v. Wunderlich, 26 Or.App. 407, 552 P.2d 1321 (1976).

LEE, Judge.

I join in the opinion of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases