On September 8, 1972, plaintiff commenced this action by service of a summons captioned "Action for Divorce" with a notice setting forth the grounds therefor as being adultery and cruel and inhuman treatment. In the subsequent complaint, however, facts were alleged to support only the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment while a second cause of action was also alleged for an annulment on the ground of fraud. For her part, defendant counterclaimed for divorce on the grounds...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
