1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 221 S.E.2d
  5. 221 S.E.2d 917 (1976)
 

AMAKER v. AMAKER

No. 754DC738.

221 S.E.2d 917 (1976)

28 N.C. App. 558

Karen Ann AMAKER, Petitioner, v. James A. AMAKER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 18, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Parks H. Icenhour, Raleigh, and Associate Atty. David L. Best, for petitioner appellee.

Cameron & Collins by E. C. Collins, Jacksonville, for respondent appellant.

HEDRICK, Judge.

We note at the outset that defendant's brief fails to "contain, properly numbered, the several grounds of exception and assignment of error with reference to the pages of the record . . ." as provided in Rule 28, Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals. Indeed it is difficult for this court to determine just what assignments of error or exceptions are relied upon by the appellant. We do ascertain, however...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases