1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 554 P.2d
  5. 554 P.2d 573 (1976)
 

WAMSHER v. BROOKS PRODUCTS, INC.

554 P.2d 573 (1976)

26 Or.App. 835

In the Matter of the Compensation of William WAMSHER, Claimant, Appellant, v. BROOKS PRODUCTS, INC., and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Rodney Kirkpatrick, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey, Williamson & Schwabe and Michael D. Hoffman, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FORT and TANZER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The issue here is whether claimant demonstrated good cause under ORS 656.3191 for his delay in requesting a hearing after his employer's insurance company denied his claim for compensation for a disability to his right shoulder. We agree with the Workmen's Compensation Board and the trial judge that claimant did not demonstrate good cause. We adopt the opinion of the Board which reads...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases