PER CURIAM.
The appellant was found in contempt for failure to comply with certain features of an order entered in a domestic relations case. The order related to temporary alimony and child support.
The appellant contends he is entitled to a reversal because the order failed to make a specific finding that the appellant wilfully disobeyed a prior ruling of the trial court, citing Ratner v. Ratner, Fla.App. 1974,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.