BRUCKER v. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA EUROPE N.V.

Nos. 74 Civ. 5755, 75 Civ. 229 and 75 Civ. 1736.

424 F.Supp. 679 (1976)

Edward BRUCKER et al., Plaintiffs, v. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA EUROPE N.V. et al., Defendants. William B. WEINBERGER, Plaintiff, v. Richard J. POWERS et al., Defendants. SHAMROCK CORPORATION, Individually and on behalf of all holders of Common Stock and Warrants of Indian Head, Inc., similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. INDIAN HEAD, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

November 15, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Austrian, Lance & Stewart, P. C., New York City, Lead Counsel for plaintiffs; by William Klein II, Keith A. Taylor, New York City, of counsel.

Weinstein & Levinson, New York City, for plaintiff Weinberger by Frank Weinstein and Lawrence Sucharow, New York City, of counsel.

Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman, Herz & Frank, New York City, for plaintiff Shamrock by Donald M. Landis, Harvey M. Sklaver, New York City, of counsel.

Shearman & Sterling, New York City, for defendants Thyssen-Bornemisza Europe N.V., Thyssen-Bornemisza, Inc., White, Weld & Co. Inc., Herbert E. Bachrach, Gerard B. Huiskamp, H. H. Thyssen-Bornemisza, R. L. Genillard by Robert S. Blanc, III, Arne Hovdesven, New York City, of counsel.

Richard J. Cutler, New York City, for defendant Indian Head, Inc.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, for defendants James G. Ferguson, James M. Flack, Andrew Kalman, Paul W. McAlister, John E. O'Sullivan, Richard J. Powers, James E. Robison, Robert M. Schwarzenbach and Marshall F. S. Smith by Robert Rosenman, Anthony A. Dean, New York City, of counsel.

Blank, Rome, Klaus & Comisky, Philadelphia, Pa., for objectors by Edwin P. Rome, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel.


MEMORANDUM

STEWART, District Judge:

Before the Court is an application pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for approval of a proposed settlement. Counsel for both plaintiffs and defendants have submitted well documented papers in support of the proposed settlement. Objectors have presented papers in response, and have been heard at hearings before this Court on October 13 and 18, 1976...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases