LUBELL v. WORK WEAR CORP.


86 Misc.2d 1001 (1976)

Michael Lubell, Respondent, v. Work Wear Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

January 16, 1976


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Monasch Chazen & Stream (Arnold C. Stream and Robert G. Smith of counsel), for appellant. Ronald Forster and Martin R. Nat for respondent.

Concur: GROAT, P. J., SCHWARTZWALD and O'CONNOR, JJ.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Defendant's attorney did not demonstrate that he was a person with sufficient knowledge of the facts to respond to the interrogatories (CPLR 3134, subd [a]).

Furthermore, the court's imposition of costs did not constitute an abuse of discretion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases