SALMINEN v. FRANKSON

No. 46458.

245 N.W.2d 839 (1976)

Michael A. SALMINEN, Sr., Appellant, v. Helia A. FRANKSON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 30, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lapp, Lazar, Laurie & Smith, Raymond M. Lazar and Frank Abramson, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Edward J. Matonich, Hibbing, for respondent.

Heard before ROGOSHESKE, KELLY and SCOTT, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.


ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

In plaintiff's action to compel defendant, Helia A. Frankson, to convey real estate pursuant to the claimed timely exercise of an option to purchase, this single issue is raised: Whether, absent any provision in the option agreement, written notice of the exercise of the option received 2 days after the last day on which the agreement provides that notice must be given is effective if it was mailed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases