KAPPEL v. FISHER BROS., 6TH AVE. CORP.


39 N.Y.2d 1039 (1976)

Robert Kappel, Appellant, v. Fisher Bros., 6th Ave. Corp., et al., Defendants-Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Akron Wrecking Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 15, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herman Yellon and Andrew D. Polin for appellant.

James B. Reich, Nathan Cyperstein and Julius Gantman for defendants-respondents and third-party plaintiffs-appellants.

Abraham I. Marglin and Herbert Lasky for third-party defendant-respondent.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated by that court in its memorandum. (49 A.D.2d 578.) We add, however, that section 241 of the Labor Law was amended in 1969, nearly two and one-half years after the accident involved in this case and, as a result, it may no longer be necessary to establish, as plaintiff was required and failed to do...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases