SKOOKUM CO., INC. v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION


554 P.2d 520 (1976)

276 Or. 303

The SKOOKUM CO., INC., Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided September 30, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Ruyle of Sabin, Newcomb, Sabin & Meyer, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner.

Donald S. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were James W. Kasameyer and Richardson & Murphy, Portland, for respondents Wells, Gibson, McDonald, Mandrones, Webber, Burke, Olsen, Haliski, Erceg, Peterson and Clegg. Also on the brief was Peggy Viamonte, Appellate Division Asst., Salem, for respondent Employment Division.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and McALLISTER, O'CONNELL, HOLMAN, TONGUE, HOWELL and BRYSON, JJ.


HOWELL, Justice.

This is a petition for review of a decision by the Court of Appeals affirming an award of unemployment benefits to certain employees of the Skookum Company for the period of December 1, 1974, to January 10, 1975. The Court of Appeals held that these claimants were entitled to unemployment compensation following their attempt to return from a strike. 24 Or.App. 271, 545 P.2d 914 (1976). The majority concluded that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases