1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 226 S.E.2d
  5. 226 S.E.2d 848 (1976)
 

REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF CITY OF DURHAM v. HOLMAN

No. 7514SC942.

226 S.E.2d 848 (1976)

30 N.C. App. 395

REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF the CITY OF DURHAM v. Margaret G. HOLMAN (widow) et al.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 4, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwards & Manson by Daniel K. Edwards, Durham, for petitioner.

Eugene C. Brooks, III and Richard N. Watson, Durham, for respondents.

MARTIN, Judge.

Petitioner contends that the trial court erred in allowing respondents' motion for a remittitur and refusing to grant the petitioner's motion for a new trial.

While it is generally stated that the judgment should follow the verdict, Bethea v. Kenly, 261 N.C. 730, 136 S.E.2d 38 (1964), the court has the power to reduce the verdict of its own motion so long as the party...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases