STATE v. LUCIOW

No. 45483.

240 N.W.2d 833 (1976)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Theodore Elk LUCIOW, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 26, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bergstein & Foster, Sherman Bergstein and Curtis H. Foster, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Robert W. Johnson, County Atty., Dennis Schloss, Asst. County Atty., Anoka, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


TODD, Justice.

Defendant, Theodore Elko Luciow (Luciow), appeals his conviction on two counts of possession of a controlled substance. He contends the trial court erred in refusing to compel the prosecution to disclose the name of the informant whose information was the basis for the search warrant. Luciow also asserts as error the admission into evidence of substances obtained from his companion at the time of arrest,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases