1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 225 S.E.2d
  5. 225 S.E.2d 843 (1976)
 

STATE v. GAINEY

No. 7619SC81.

225 S.E.2d 843 (1976)

29 N.C. App. 653

STATE of North Carolina v. Timithy Ray GAINEY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 16, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Special Deputy Atty. Gen. John R. B. Matthis, Raleigh, and Associate Atty. Jo Anne Sanford Routh, for the State.

Davis, Ford & Weinhold by Robert M. Davis, Salisbury, for defendant-appellant.

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in permitting the witnesses Vickie and Wayne Dunn to state opinions as to the speed of defendant's automobile as it approached the intersection where the collision occurred. We find no merit in this contention. While the period of time that they observed defendant's approaching automobile was brief, we think it was of sufficient duration for them to form opinions as to speed. State v. Clayton,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases