1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 223 S.E.2d
  5. 223 S.E.2d 843 (1976)
 

STATE v. CLARK

No. 7527SC965.

223 S.E.2d 843 (1976)

29 N.C. App. 213

STATE of North Carolina v. Wesley CLARK.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 21, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Special Deputy Atty. John R. B. Matthis, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.

Harris & Bumgardner by Don H. Bumgardner, Gastonia, for defendant-appellant.

HEDRICK, Judge.

By his one assignment of error, defendant contends the evidence adduced at the hearing does not support the findings and conclusion that defendant wilfully violated the terms and conditions of probation.

Whether the defendant had willfully violated the conditions of his probation is a question of fact to be determined by the judge. State v. Barrett, 243 N.C. 686, 91 S.E.2d 917

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases