VAUGHN, Judge.
Plaintiff's first three arguments question the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury on defendant's counterclaim. When the evidence is considered in the light most favorable to defendant we find it sufficient to take the case to the jury.
Plaintiff's fourth argument, that the verdict should be set aside because it is inconsistent, is without merit. It was not inconsistent for the jury to find that defendant was indebted to plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
