STANCILL v. CITY OF WASHINGTON

No. 762SC118.

225 S.E.2d 834 (1976)

29 N.C. App. 707

Daisy Arlene STANCILL v. CITY OF WASHINGTON and Jack H. Webb.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 16, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton S. Brown and LeRoy Scott, Washington, for plaintiff appellant.

Rodman, Rodman & Holscher by Edward N. Rodman and David C. Francisco, Washington, for defendant appellees.


HEDRICK, Judge.

The only assignment of error brought forward and argued on appeal is whether the trial court erred in allowing defendants' motion for summary judgment and in dismissing the action. A party moving for summary judgment must show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E.2d 823 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases