Claimant left her employment to go to Florida with her husband who, because of a heart condition, had been medically advised to move to a warmer climate. The board sustained the referee's finding that no compelling necessity required claimant's presence in Florida since claimant, at her hearing, stated, "I am not required to take care of my husband as he is able to get out and around and wait on himself." She further conceded that her husband does not require that she care...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
