This action seeks to establish that the defendant may not exercise his discretion to purchase New York State obligations as trustee of the common retirement fund without first showing that it is a sound exercise of discretion and/or to establish that the defendant may not purchase such obligations as a matter of law. The background of this proceeding is set forth in Westchester Chapter, Civ. Serv. Employees Assn. v Levitt (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
AL SGAGLIONE v. LEVITT
54 A.D.2d 1001 (1976)
Al Sgaglione, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated as Members of The New York State Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System, et al., Appellants, v. Arthur Levitt, as Comptroller of The State of New York, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 4, 1976
November 4, 1976
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.