1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 229 S.E.2d
  5. 229 S.E.2d 823 (1976)
 

LITTLE v. COUNTY OF ORANGE

No. 7615SC449.

229 S.E.2d 823 (1976)

Crowell LITTLE v. COUNTY OF ORANGE and Town of Chapel Hill.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 17, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Midgette, Page & Higgins by Thomas D. Higgins, III, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff-appellant.

Winston, Coleman & Bernholz by Geoffrey E. Gledhill, Chapel Hill, for County of Orange, defendant-appellee.

Haywood, Denny & Miller by Emery B. Denny, Jr., and James H. Johnson, III, Chapel Hill, for Town of Chapel Hill, defendant-appellee.

ARNOLD, Judge.

The issue here is whether plaintiff has a security interest which is superior to the tax liens of Orange County and the Town of Chapel Hill. Requirements for an enforceable security interest in cases not involving land are (1) a writing; (2) the debtor's signature; and (3) a description of the collateral. Evans v. Everett, 279 N.C. 352, 183 S.E.2d 109 (1971). Also see...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases