CROMAR CO. v. NUCLEAR MATERIALS & EQUIPMENT CORP.

No. 75-2053.

543 F.2d 501 (1976)

The CROMAR COMPANY, Appellant, v. NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION and Atlantic Richfield Company, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided September 14, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Youngman, Jr., John M. Humphrey, Candor, Youngman, Gibson & Gault, Williamsport, Pa., for appellant.

David J. Armstrong, M. Richard Dunlap, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.

Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and ROSENN and GARTH, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge.

This private antitrust suit raises two questions for our consideration. The first concerns standing to maintain a Sherman Act § 2 monopolization claim. The second involves the admissibility of evidence to establish a Sherman Act § 1 conspiracy in restraint of trade claim arising from the termination of a contract. In contrast to the district court, we conclude that the plaintiff has standing under §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases