UNITED STATES v. Y. HATA & CO., LTD.

Nos. 75-1681 and 75-1680.

535 F.2d 508 (1976)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Y. HATA & COMPANY, LIMITED, a corporation, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Minoru HATA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 5, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin Y. Sasaki (argued), Honolulu, Hawaii, and George Alexander McKray (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Thomas S. Brett, Atty. (argued), Consumer Affairs Section, Antitrust Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, District Judge.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from convictions of a corporation and its agent under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [June 25, 1938, c. 675, 52 Stat. 1040; 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.].

Appellants argue:

(1) The trial court should have instructed the jury that defendants could not be convicted if it was "objectively impossible" for them to prevent violations of the law; and (2) The indictment should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases