1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 549 P.2d
  5. 549 P.2d 471 (1976)
 

HING BO GUM v. NAKAMURA

No. 5691.

549 P.2d 471 (1976)

HING BO GUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mataichi NAKAMURA et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

April 29, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bert T. Kobayashi, Jr., Honolulu (Kobayashi, Koshiba & Watanabe, Honolulu, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Wendell H. Marumoto, Honolulu (Marumoto & Shigezawa, Honolulu, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., OGATA, MENOR and KIDWELL, JJ., and KATO, Circuit Judge, in place of KOBAYASHI, J., disqualified.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed in the court below a complaint against the defendants for specific performance, or in the alternative for damages. His claim is predicated upon a written agreement, more commonly known as a deposit, receipt, offer and acceptance (hereinafter DROA).

In their answer to the complaint, defendants Mataichi Nakamura and Oteru Nakamura Ikeda (hereinafter defendants-sellers)1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases