On this appeal defendant claims (1) that the trial court erred in not suppressing defendant's statement to a public officer on the ground that his statement was involuntary and in violation of CPL 60.45 and his rights derived from the United States and New York State Constitutions, and (2) that this court should reverse the judgment as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice. The trial court found that evidence presented at the suppression hearing proved beyond...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
