RUSSELL CORP. v. UNITED STATES

No. 64-73.

537 F.2d 474 (1976)

RUSSELL CORPORATION, formerly known as Monitor Publications, Inc. v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

July 9, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O. P. Easterwood, Jr., Washington, D.C., atty. of record, and Conrad Philos, Vienna, Va., for plaintiff. Lansford F. Butler, Lakewood, Colo., of counsel.

Floyd France, Washington, D.C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen., Peter R. Taft, Washington, D.C., for defendant. Herbert Pittle, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Before NICHOLS, KASHIWA and BENNETT, Judges.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This case comes before the court on plaintiff's exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Kenneth R. Harkins, filed December 9, 1975, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted to the court on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge's recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby affirms and adopts the same...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases