PER CURIAM.
Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction and five year sentence for grand larceny on the grounds he was denied due process of law as a result of the prosecutor's comment in closing argument on defendant's indigency and legal representation by the public defender.
The prosecution's version of the facts, which the jury chose to believe, is as follows:
Defendant Reaves and a companion entered a Goodyear store. For the purpose of distraction...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
